128 research outputs found

    Nonlocal elliptic equations in bounded domains: a survey

    Get PDF
    In this paper we survey some results on the Dirichlet problem {Lu=fin Ωu=gin Rn\Ω\left\{ \begin{array}{rcll} L u &=&f&\textrm{in }\Omega \\ u&=&g&\textrm{in }\mathbb R^n\backslash\Omega \end{array}\right. for nonlocal operators of the form Lu(x)=PV∫Rn{u(x)−u(x+y)}K(y)dy.Lu(x)=\textrm{PV}\int_{\mathbb R^n}\bigl\{u(x)-u(x+y)\bigr\}K(y)dy. We start from the very basics, proving existence of solutions, maximum principles, and constructing some useful barriers. Then, we focus on the regularity properties of solutions, both in the interior and on the boundary of the domain. In order to include some natural operators LL in the regularity theory, we do not assume any regularity on the kernels. This leads to some interesting features that are purely nonlocal, in the sense that have no analogue for local equations. We hope that this survey will be useful for both novel and more experienced researchers in the field

    Boundary regularity, Pohozaev identities, and nonexistence results

    Full text link
    In this expository paper we survey some recent results on Dirichlet problems of the form Lu=f(x,u)Lu=f(x,u) in Ω\Omega, u≡0u\equiv0 in Rn\Ω\mathbb R^n\backslash\Omega. We first discuss in detail the boundary regularity of solutions, stating the main known results of Grubb and of the author and Serra. We also give a simplified proof of one of such results, focusing on the main ideas and on the blow-up techniques that we developed in \cite{RS-K,RS-stable}. After this, we present the Pohozaev identities established in \cite{RS-Poh,RSV,Grubb-Poh} and give a sketch of their proofs, which use strongly the fine boundary regularity results discussed previously. Finally, we show how these Pohozaev identities can be used to deduce nonexistence of solutions or unique continuation properties. The operators LL under consideration are integro-differential operator of order 2s2s, s∈(0,1)s\in(0,1), the model case being the fractional Laplacian L=(−Δ)sL=(-\Delta)^s.Comment: Survey article. To appear as a chapter in "Recent Developments in the Nonlocal Theory" by De Gruyte

    Regularity of stable solutions up to dimension 7 in domains of double revolution

    Full text link
    We consider the class of semi-stable positive solutions to semilinear equations −Δu=f(u)-\Delta u=f(u) in a bounded domain Ω⊂Rn\Omega\subset\mathbb R^n of double revolution, that is, a domain invariant under rotations of the first mm variables and of the last n−mn-m variables. We assume 2≤m≤n−22\leq m\leq n-2. When the domain is convex, we establish a priori LpL^p and H01H^1_0 bounds for each dimension nn, with p=∞p=\infty when n≤7n\leq7. These estimates lead to the boundedness of the extremal solution of −Δu=λf(u)-\Delta u=\lambda f(u) in every convex domain of double revolution when n≤7n\leq7. The boundedness of extremal solutions is known when n≤3n\leq3 for any domain Ω\Omega, in dimension n=4n=4 when the domain is convex, and in dimensions 5≤n≤95\leq n\leq9 in the radial case. Except for the radial case, our result is the first partial answer valid for all nonlinearities ff in dimensions 5≤n≤95\leq n\leq 9

    Sobolev and isoperimetric inequalities with monomial weights

    Full text link
    We consider the monomial weight ∣x1∣A1...∣xn∣An|x_1|^{A_1}...|x_n|^{A_n} in Rn\mathbb R^n, where Ai≥0A_i\geq0 is a real number for each i=1,...,ni=1,...,n, and establish Sobolev, isoperimetric, Morrey, and Trudinger inequalities involving this weight. They are the analogue of the classical ones with the Lebesgue measure dxdx replaced by ∣x1∣A1...∣xn∣Andx|x_1|^{A_1}...|x_n|^{A_n}dx, and they contain the best or critical exponent (which depends on A1A_1, ..., AnA_n). More importantly, for the Sobolev and isoperimetric inequalities, we obtain the best constant and extremal functions. When AiA_i are nonnegative \textit{integers}, these inequalities are exactly the classical ones in the Euclidean space RD\mathbb R^D (with no weight) when written for axially symmetric functions and domains in RD=RA1+1×...×RAn+1\mathbb R^D=\mathbb R^{A_1+1}\times...\times\mathbb R^{A_n+1}.Comment: The proof of Theorem 1.6 in the previous version of this paper was not correct. Indeed, Lemma 5.1 in that version was not true as stated therein. We thank Georgios Psaradakis for pointing this to u

    Boundary regularity for fully nonlinear integro-differential equations

    Full text link
    We study fine boundary regularity properties of solutions to fully nonlinear elliptic integro-differential equations of order 2s2s, with s∈(0,1)s\in(0,1). We consider the class of nonlocal operators L∗⊂L0\mathcal L_*\subset \mathcal L_0, which consists of infinitesimal generators of stable L\'evy processes belonging to the class L0\mathcal L_0 of Caffarelli-Silvestre. For fully nonlinear operators II elliptic with respect to L∗\mathcal L_*, we prove that solutions to Iu=fI u=f in Ω\Omega, u=0u=0 in Rn∖Ω\mathbb R^n\setminus\Omega, satisfy u/ds∈Cs+γ(Ω‾)u/d^s\in C^{s+\gamma}(\overline\Omega), where dd is the distance to ∂Ω\partial\Omega and f∈Cγf\in C^\gamma. We expect the class L∗\mathcal L_* to be the largest scale invariant subclass of L0\mathcal L_0 for which this result is true. In this direction, we show that the class L0\mathcal L_0 is too large for all solutions to behave like dsd^s. The constants in all the estimates in this paper remain bounded as the order of the equation approaches 2. Thus, in the limit s↑1s\uparrow1 we recover the celebrated boundary regularity result due to Krylov for fully nonlinear elliptic equations.Comment: To appear in Duke Math.
    • …
    corecore